Comparative Report [4] Patent scope and Prior arts
Patent scope and Prior arts
1. Comparison analysis
(1)
i) Literal scope
German infringe courts do not accept any objection based on prior arts regarding the patent infringement.
In the past, some scholars argued the introduction of “Einrede des freien Standes der Technik“ or “objection of free technical standard” in English because German patent law had the statutory limitation of 5 years for the invalidation procedure before 1941. However, Current German patent law no longer has the statutory limitation for the invalidation process, and the alleged infringer can file a request for invalidation to the
Thus, German infringe courts do not accept any objection based on prior arts.
ii) Doctrine of equivalents
Prior arts can limit the application of Doctrine of equivalents as endorsed in “Formstein case” (Judgment of Federal Supreme Court of Germany, April 29, 1986, 18 IIC 795 (1987).). The objection based on prior arts are called “Formsteineinwand” or “Formstein objection” in English.
This objection is based on the premise that a prior art outside of the literal scope of patent can not necessarily invalidate the patent.
(2)
i) Literal scope
US infringe courts can invalidate the patent based on prior arts in the patent infringement procedure.
ii) Doctrine of equivalents
Prior arts can limit the application of Doctrine of equivalents as endorsed in “
(3)
i) Literal scope
Japanese infringe courts can invalidate the patent based on prior arts in the patent infringement procedure.
ii) Doctrine of equivalents
Prior arts limit the application of Doctrine of equivalents as endorsed in Tsubakimoto Seiko v. THK K.K., 1630 Hanrei Jiho 32 (Sup.
2. Practice guideline
Currently, Japanese court system is similar to
End of report
- IP Report Categories
- All
- Important points in JP practice
- Court Decisions
- Amendments on Laws / Regulations
- Recent topics
- Services(Patent & Utility Model)
- Japanese Patent Application
(Paris Route) - Japanese National Phase Entry
(PCT Route) - Japanese utility model application
- Request for examination
- Request for accelerated examination including PPH
- Request for utility model technical opinion
- Argument /Amendment
- Appeal against examiner's decision of refusal
- Trial for patent invalidation
- Trial for correction
- Suit against appeal/trial decision made by JPO
- Divisional application
- Converted application
- Japanese patent & utility model search
- Patent infringement suit
- Patent translation (English-Japanese)